Tech Disrupt Submission & Scoring Criteria

Tech Disrupt €25k Banner

TECH DISRUPT 4.0 FINAL PITCH – FINAL SUBMISSION CRITERIA

 

Submission Presentation: Presentation slide decks and any associated materials must be submitted to LEO by 5pm December 1st 2020. Submission email address is roger.leyden@rml-marketing.com

Live Pitch: Applicants will be required to make a live online pitch to a panel of judges on December 4th 2020. Pitch will last for 15 minutes (5 minute pitch and 10 minutes for judges Q&A). Individual time slots to be confirmed.

  

TECH DISRUPT 4.0 FINAL PITCH – JUDGES SCORING CRITERIA

  1. Founders/Teams Background – 15%

Score (Max 15)

Comment

11 to 15

Advanced – Very good track   record with great skillsets and very clear knowledge of proposed marketplace

6 to 10

Strong – Good track record and   reasonable knowledge of appropriate market sector for product or solution

1 to 5

Average – some minor   experience, unsure of overall commitment to product or solution

  1. Ability to Commercialise and Potential Market Opportunity for Product or Service – 30%

Score (Max 30)

Comment

21 to 30

High – Value proposition clearly articulated. Scalable   proposition matched by ambition of promoters. Strong market opportunity   identified and comprehensive understanding of the competitive landscape

11 to 20

Satisfactory – Value proposition articulated. Reasonable   market opportunity identified and good understanding of the competitive   landscape

1 to 10

Poor - Value proposition poorly articulated. Limited market   opportunity identified and little understanding of the competitive landscape

  1. Innovation & Alignment to Principles of Industry 4.0 – 30%

Score (Max 30)

Comment

21 to 30

High – Significant level of   innovation and Industry 4.0 technological applications. Product or service   may have potential to disrupt marketplace

11 to 20

Satisfactory – Reasonable   innovation and alignment with Industry 4.0. Product or service has potential   to compete in chosen marketplace

1 to 10

Poor – Some innovation, many   similar products on mass market, minor Industry 4.0 alignment

 

  1. Ability of Promoter to Deliver Key Commercial & Technical Milestones over following 12 month period – 25%

Score (Max 25)

Comment

18 to 25

High – Applicant has a clear defined strategy and roadmap with   very clear, achievable and measurable technical and commercial milestones

9 to 17

Satisfactory – Applicant has an outline strategy and roadmap   with technical and commercial milestones that are reasonably clear,   achievable, and measurable

1 to 8

Poor – Some attempt made at addressing the question